Evaluation of bat-related knowledge, perceptions, and practices in an urban community: A strategy for Conservation Biology and health promotion

Resumo

The aim of this ethnozoological study was to identify variables related to knowledge, perceptions, and practices associated with the occurrence of bats in an urban area. We carried a retrospective observational study with residents of 31 cases and 178 control households. We defined the cases as households where accidents occurred from 2012 to 2015, according to official health records. The control households have no accident record in the same area. We conducted data collection through a semi-structured questionnaire and performed descriptive analyses and proportion (chi-square) to identify differences between the responses of cases and controls. We have identified important gaps in relation to basic knowledge, good practices, and the importance of bats to public health. These findings should be targeted for intervention and correction by environmental educators and health managers aimed at reducing the risk of accidents with bats and zoonosis, mainly rabies.

Referências

1. Bahia. Plano de Reabilitação Participativo:
2. Avanços. Salvador: Companhia de
3. Desenvolvimento Urbano do Estado da Bahia,
4. Centro Antigo de Salvador, 2014.
5. Bjerke, T.; Østdahl, T. Animal-related
6. attitudes and activities in an urban
7. population. Anthrozoös, v. 17, no. 2,
8. p. 109-129, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2752/
9. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e
10. Estatística. Censo Demográfico. 2010.
11. Available from: <http://www.censo2010.
12. ibge.gov.br/resultados.html>. Accessed on:
13. Apr. 23, 2019.
14. Bredt, A.; Araújo, F. A. A.; Caetano Júnior, J.;
15. Rodrigues, Ma. G. R.; Yoshizawa, M.; Silva, M.
16. M. S.; Harmani, N. M. S.; Massunaga, P. N. T.;
17. Bürer, S. P.; Porto, V. A. R.; Uieda, W.
18. Morcegos em áreas urbana e rurais:
19. manual de manejo e controle. Brasília:
20. Fundação Nacional de Saúde, 1998.
21. Bredt, A.; Uieda, W.; Magalhães, E. D.
22. Morcegos cavernícolas da Região do Distrito
23. Federal, Centro-Oeste do Brasil (Mammalia,
24. Chiroptera). Revista Brasileira de Zoologia,
25. v. 16, no. 3, p. 731-770, 1999.
26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-
27. Brooks, R. T. Habitat-associated and temporal
28. patterns of bat activity in a diverse forest
29. landscape of Southern New England, USA.
30. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 18, no. 3,
31. p. 529-545, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/
32. s10531-008-9518-x
33. Bruno, M.; Kraemer, B. M. Percepções de
34. estudantes da 6ª série (7º ano) do “Ensino
35. Fundamental” em uma escola pública de Belo
36. Horizonte, MG sobre os morcegos: uma
37. abordagem etnozoológica. e-Scientia, v. 3,
38. no. 2, p. 42-50, 2010. Available from:
39. <https://revistas.unibh.br/dcbas/article/vie
40. w/169>. Accessed on: Apr. 23, 2019.
41. Cleveland, C. J.; Betke, M.; Federico, P.; Frank,
42. J. D.; Hallam, T. G.; Horn, J.; Kunz, T. H.
43. Economic value of the pest control service
44. provided by Brazilian free-tailed bats in
45. South-Central Texas. Frontiers in Ecology
46. and the Environment, v. 4, no. 5, p. 238-243,
47. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-
48. (2006)004[0238:EVOTPC]2.0.CO;2
49. Delpietro, H.; Konolsaisen, F.; Marchevsky, N.;
50. Russo, G. Domestic cat predation on vampire
51. bats (Desmodus-Rotundus) while foraging on
52. goats, pigs, cows and human-beings. Applied
53. Animal Behaviour Science, v. 39, no. 2,
54. p. 141-150, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/
55. -1591(94)90134-1
56. Esbérard, C. E. L.; Chagas, A. S.; Luz, E. M.;
57. Carneiro, R. A. Pesquisa com público sobre
58. morcegos. Chiroptera Neotropical, v. 2,
59. no. 1, p. 44-45, 1996.
60. Evelyn, M. Conservation of bats in suburban
61. landscapes: Roost selection by Myotis
62. yumanensis in a residential area in California.
63. Biological Conservation, v. 115, no. 3,
64. p. 463-473, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/
65. S0006-3207(03)00163-0
66. Gomes, S.; Helena, M.; Manfrinato, V. Bats:
67. Perceptions of elementary school students
68. and environmental education practices.
69. Ciência & Educação, v. 19, no. 4, p. 859-877,
70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-
71. Hayes, J. P. Temporal variation in activity of
72. bats and the design of echolocationmonitoring studies. Journal of Mammalogy,
73. v. 78, no. 2, p. 514-524, 1997.
74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404918
75. Hourigan, C. L.; Johnson, C.; Robson, S. K. The
76. structure of a micro-bat community in
77. relation to gradients of environmental
78. variation in a tropical urban area. Urban
79. Ecosystems, v. 9, no. 2, p. 67-82. 2006.
80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-006-7902-4
81. Il’in, V. Y.; Smirnov, D. G.; Yanyaeva, N. M.
82. Effects of the anthropogenic factor on bats
83. (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in the Volga
84. Region. Russian Journal of Ecology, v. 34,
85. no. 2, p. 122-126, 2003. https://doi.org/
86. 1023/A:1023003215329
87. Jung, K.; Kaiser, S.; Böhm, S.; Nieschulze, J.;
88. Kalko, E. K. V. Moving in three dimensions:
89. Effects of structural complexity on
90. occurrence and activity of insectivorous bats
91. in managed forest stands. Journal of Applied
92. Ecology, v. 49, no. 2, p. 523-531, 2012.
93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.
94. x
95. Kalko, K. V. Insect pursuit, prey capture and
96. echolocation in pipistrelle bats
97. (Microchiroptera). Animal Behaviour, v. 50,
98. no. 4, p. 861-880, 1995. https://doi.org/
99. 1016/0003-3472(95)80090-5
100. Kotait, I.; Takaoka, N. Y.; Panachão, M. R. I.;
101. Sodré, M. M.; Figueiredo, A. C. C.; Schimonsky,
102. B. V.; Andrade, A. M.; Silva, L. H. Q.; Pedro, W.
103. A.; Fabián, M. H.; Bredt, A.; Esbérard, C.;
104. Favoretto, S.; Carrieri, M. L. Manejo de
105. quirópteros em áreas urbanas. São Paulo:
106. Instituto Pasteur, 1998. (Manual técnico do
107. Instituto Pasteur, 7). Available from:
108. <http://portal.saude.sp.gov.br/resources/ins
109. tituto-pasteur/pdf/manuais/manual_
110. pdf>. Accessed on: Apr. 23, 2019.
111. Kuenzi, A. J.; Morrison, M. L. Temporal
112. patterns of bat activity in Southern Arizona.
113. Journal of Wildlife Management, v. 67,
114. no. 1, p. 52-64, 2003. https://doi.org/
115. 2307/3803061
116. Kunz, T. H.; Braun de Torrez, E.; Bauer, D.;
117. Lobova, T.; Fleming, T. H. Ecosystem services
118. provided by bats. Annals of the New York
119. Academy of Sciences, v. 1223, p. 1-38, 2011.
120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.
121. x
122. Liesener, A. L.; Smith, K. E.; Davis, R. D.;
123. Bender, J. B.; Danila, R. N.; Neitzel, D. F.;
124. Scheftel, J. M. Circumstances of bat
125. encounters and knowledge of rabies among
126. Minnesota residents submitting bats for
127. rabies testing. Vector Borne and Zoonotic
128. Diseases, v. 6, no. 2, p. 208-215, 2006.
129. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2006.6.208
130. Lu, H.; McComas, K. A.; Buttke, D. E.; Roh, S.;
131. Wild, M. A. A One Health message about bats
132. increases intentions to follow public health
133. guidance on bat rabies. PlosONE, v. 11, no. 5,
134. e0156205, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/
135. journal.pone.0156205
136. Mickleburgh, S. P.; Hutson, A. M.; Racey, P. A.
137. A review of the global conservation status of
138. bats major threats. Oryx, v. 36, p. 18-34,
139. https://doi.org/10.1017/S00306053
140. Milne, D. J.; Fisher, A.; Rainey, I.; Pavey, C. R.
141. Temporal patterns of bats in the Top End of
142. the Northern Territory, Australia. Journal of
143. Mammalogy, v. 86, no. 5, p. 909-920, 2005.
144. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2005)
145. [909:TPOBIT]2.0.CO;2
146. Moosman, P. R.; Thomas, H. H.; Veilleux, J. P.
147. Diet of the widespread insectivorous bats
148. Eptesicus fuscus and Myotis lucifugus relative
149. to climate and richness of bat communities.
150. Journal of Mammalogy, v. 93, no. 2, p. 491-
151. , 2012. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-
152. MAMM-A-274.1
153. Moran, D.; Juliao, P.; Alvarez, D.; Lindblade, K.
154. A.; Ellison, J. A.; Gilbert, A. T.; Recuenco, S.
155. Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding
156. rabies and exposure to bats in two rural
157. communities in Guatemala. BMC Research
158. Notes, 8:955, 2015. https://doi.org/
159. 1186/s13104-014-0955-1
160. Nogueira, M. R.; Lima, I. P.; Moratelli, R.;
161. Tavares, V. D. C.; Gregorin, R.; Peracchi, A. L.
162. Checklist of Brazilian bats, with comments on
163. original records. Check List, v. 10, no. 4,
164. p. 808-821, 2014. https://doi.org/10.15560/
165. 4.808
166. Novaes, R. R. M.; Nobre, C. C. Dieta de Artibeus
167. lituratus (Olfers, 1818) em área urbana na
168. Cidade do Rio de Janeiro: frugivoria e novo
169. registro de folivoria. Chiroptera
170. Neotropical, v. 15, p. 487-493, 2009.
171. Pacheco, S. M.; Sodré, M.; Gama, A. R.; Bredt,
172. A.; Sanches, E. M. C.; Marques, R. V.;
173. Guimarães, M. M.; Bianconi, G. Morcegos
174. urbanos: status do conhecimento e plano de
175. ação para a conservação no Brasil.
176. Chiroptera Neotropical, v. 16, no. 1, p. 629-
177. , 2010.
178. Phillips, S.; Coburn, D.; James, R. An
179. observation of cat predation upon an eastern
180. blossom bat Syconycteris australis.
181. Australian Mammalogy, v. 23, no. 1, p. 57-
182. , 2001. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM01057
183. Prokop, P.; Tunnicliffe, S. D. “Disgusting”
184. animals: Primary school children’s attitudes
185. and myths of bats and spiders. Eurasia
186. Journal of Mathematics, Science and
187. Technology Education, v. 4, no. 2, p. 87-97,
188. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/
189. Reis, N. R.; Lima, I. P.; Peracchi, A. L. Morcegos
190. (Chiroptera) da área urbana de Londrina,
191. Paraná, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de
192. Zoologia, v. 19, no. 3, p. 739-746, 2002.
193. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-817520020
194. Robertson, K.; Lumlertdacha, B.; Franka, R.;
195. Petersen, B.; Bhengsri, S.; Henchaichon, S.;
196. Rupprecht, C. E. Rabies-related knowledge
197. and practices among persons at risk of bat
198. exposures in Thailand. PLoS Neglected
199. Tropical Diseases, v. 5, no. 6, e1054, 2011.
200. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.00010
201. Rübsamen, N.; Castell, S.; Horn, J.; Karch, A.;
202. Ott, J. J.; Raupach-Rosin, H.; Mikolajczyk, R. T.
203. Ebola risk perception in Germany, 2014.
204. Emerging Infectious Diseases, v. 21, no. 6,
205. p. 1012-1018, 2015. https://doi.org/
206. 3201/eid2106.150013
207. Sexton, B. N. R.; Stewart, S. C. Understanding
208. knowledge and perceptions of bats among
209. residents of Fort Collins, Colorado. Open-File
210. Report, p. 1-22, 2007. https://doi.org/
211. 3133/ofr20071245
212. Souza, R.; Barros, M.; Bisaggio, E. L.; Borges,
213. R. C. Morcegos (Mammalia, Chiroptera) em
214. fragmentos florestais urbanos no Município
215. de Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Sudeste do
216. Brasil. Biotropica, v. 6, no. 1,
217. BN02206012006, 2006. https://doi.org/
218. 1590/S1676-06032006000100012
219. Threlfall, C. G.; Law, B.; Banks, P. B. Sensitivity
220. of insectivorous bats to urbanization:
221. Implications for suburban conservation
222. planning. Biological Conservation, v. 146,
223. no. 1, p. 41-52, 2006. https://doi.org/
224. 1016/j.biocon.2011.11.026
225. Threlfall, C.; Law, B., Penman, T.; Banks, P. B.
226. Ecological processes in urban landscapes:
227. Mechanisms influencing the distribution and
228. activity of insectivorous bats. Ecography,
229. v. 34, no. 5, p. 814-826, 2011.
230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.
231. x
232. Woods, M.; Mcdonald, R. A.; Harris, S.
233. Predation of wildlife by domestic cats Felis
234. catus in Great Britain. Mammal Review,
235. v. 33, no. 2, p. 174-188, 2003.
236. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.
237. x
238. Zanon, C. M. V.; Reis, N. R. Bats (Mammalia,
239. Chiroptera) in the Ponta Grossa Region,
240. Campos Gerais, Paraná, Brazil. Revista
241. Brasileira de Zoologia, v. 24, no. 2, p. 327-
242. , 2007. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-